Now, another challenge was proposed, to proceed to a third transposition inspired by Varela’s star cybernetics.
My response:
simplistic/complex —> multi-ordered simplexity
how to fix/how to engage —> ascripted re-presencing
compulsive mappings/flexible relations —> constructive deconstruction
textbook categorizations/situational phenomenologies —> second-order homeodynamics
control the universe through mapping/participate in the universe through walking its territory –> co-construction of universe and self
dominant masculinist purposefulness/creatively shifting between feminine/masculine —> post-dual dynamics
shift power from the described to the describer/described and describer abdicate power to each other —> described as describer, describer as described
psychic inflation and self-magnification/psychic robustness and continuous self-recontextualization —> the fractal self
a grand pyramid with the advocate on top/a complex web with the advocate teleporting between nodes —> a-nodal/plen(r)um-nodal phase space
lacking poetic insights/poetry as rhythmic healing —> language as regenerative/dissociative capacity
lacking a feeling for the concrete/able to connect without abstraction through action —> recursive manifestation/abstraction
lacking embodiment of an aesthetic/able to create and shift between evolving aesthetics —> the aesthetics of aesthetics
PDF Related posts:
- Cybernetics of problems and solutions – an exercise in thinking complexly First-order Solution: The problem and the solution share an epistemological context, each helping drive the other. Second ‘phase’ (to the right): In this context ‘more of the solution’ creates ‘more of the problem’ through a...
